Monday, June 23, 2008
Annotated List -
This article is pretty cool. I think Library 2.0 is great, but many classes I feel push us to work it harder, make it better, do it faster. But low-tech is a great tool, we don't have to implement all these crazy whacky ideas that patrons aren't looking for from a library. Patrons don't expect us to be web designers or IT workers, we need to use our tools, not become one. I cannot agree with the learning/educational tool more. I wanted to be a teacher ever since I was 5. I changed my career, but I don't feel that I changed my core interest, I still want to inform and educate - and not grade papers. I also agree that Library 2.0 focuses more on the younger generation - and we need to not forget about serving our older patrons.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Just wait until you become a college professor!
Post a Comment